If you took out a payday loan while serving on active duty, federal military lending protections may have applied when the credit was extended.
The Military Lending Act, or MLA, protects certain active-duty servicemembers and qualifying dependents who obtain covered consumer credit. Payday loans are generally among the types of credit that can fall within the MLA. But active-duty service alone does not automatically mean a loan violated the law. The borrower’s status, the loan date, the type of credit, its cost, and its terms all matter.
For those who had a payday loan from CashNetUSA or another lender while you or your spouse was on active duty, let Varnell & Warwick help you get a closer review.

Don’t let predatory lending drain your finances. Contact Varnell & Warwick today to discuss your situation and find out if you qualify for the CashNetUSA class action lawsuit.
The MLA can apply to payday loans and other covered consumer credit extended to a covered borrower.
Under Department of Defense regulations, a covered borrower generally includes a qualifying servicemember or dependent at the time the borrower becomes obligated on the credit transaction. Covered military status can include certain active-duty servicemembers and members serving on qualifying Active Guard and Reserve duty.
That makes the loan date especially important.
For example, if you are retired or separated today but obtained the payday loan while you were serving under qualifying active-duty orders, the military status you had when the transaction occurred is an important fact to review.
Likewise, spouses and certain dependents may receive MLA protections when the legal definition of a covered borrower is satisfied.


The MLA generally prevents a creditor from imposing a Military Annual Percentage Rate, or MAPR, greater than 36% on covered consumer credit extended to a covered borrower.
MAPR and ordinary APR are not always the same calculation.
Depending on the transaction, MAPR can include charges such as finance charges, certain credit insurance costs, fees for credit-related products, and certain application or participation fees.
That distinction is important. A payday loan showing an APR above 36% does not, by itself, prove an MLA violation. A high or triple-digit APR may be a reason to examine the loan more closely, but the legal analysis generally requires determining the MAPR and reviewing the other facts surrounding the transaction.
If scammers used CashNetUSA’s name to exploit your finances, our consumer protection team can help. Reach out to Varnell & Warwick today to explore your class action legal options.
Cost is not the only issue under the MLA.
For covered consumer credit, federal regulations also restrict certain contract and repayment terms. These include requiring a covered borrower to submit disputes to mandatory arbitration, requiring repayment through a military allotment, or charging a penalty for paying the loan off early. The regulations also contain restrictions involving certain rollovers, renewals, refinancings, or consolidations by payday lenders.
This means reviewing a payday loan may involve more than looking at the interest rate.
The loan agreement, repayment method, disclosures, renewal history, and other contract terms can all be relevant. regulations permit certain electronic fund transfers used to repay consumer credit when applicable requirements are satisfied.

Don’t let scammers who weaponized CashNetUSA’s name keep your money. Contact Varnell & Warwick today to see if a class action lawsuit can help you recover your stolen funds.
If you obtained a payday loan while on active duty, consider gathering information about:
You do not need to calculate MAPR or decide for yourself whether the MLA was violated. Those questions can depend on details that are not obvious from the face of the agreement.


It can. The MLA provides federal protections, but state lending laws can provide additional protections. The federal regulation generally does not displace a state law merely because that state law gives a covered borrower greater protection.
For that reason, the state where the transaction occurred and the particular type of loan may also be relevant when reviewing payday loans obtained during active-duty service.
Federal rules give creditors ways to determine whether a consumer is a covered borrower under the MLA. A lender may check the Department of Defense database or use an indicator from a nationwide consumer reporting agency. When the creditor follows the regulatory timing and recordkeeping requirements, that determination can provide a safe harbor for the transaction.
The check generally must occur around the time the borrower applies, opens an account, or responds to a qualifying credit offer. For an active-duty payday borrower, the application date and lender records may help show how military status was evaluated before credit was extended.
. If the loan was from another payday lender, bring the lender information with you when discussing your situation.


If a covered payday loan violates the MLA, federal law provides remedies that can go beyond reducing interest or fees. A prohibited credit agreement may be void from the beginning. A person who violates the statute can face civil liability for actual damages, with at least $500 for each violation, as well as appropriate punitive, equitable, or declaratory relief.
In a successful action, the law allows recovery of court costs and reasonable attorney fees. These remedies are not automatic in every dispute. The facts, available defenses, and filing deadlines can affect what relief may be available to a particular borrower.
Ready to fight back? Tell Varnell & Warwick how CashNetUSA imposters targeted you, and let’s find out if a class action lawsuit can help recover your financial losses.

Q: Does every payday loan to an active-duty servicemember violate the MLA?
A: No. Active-duty status alone does not establish a violation. The analysis can depend on whether the person was a covered borrower, whether the loan was covered consumer credit, the MAPR, the loan terms, and other transaction-specific facts.
Q: Is the MLA limit 36% APR?
A: Not exactly. The MLA generally limits MAPR, or Military Annual Percentage Rate, to 36% for covered consumer credit. MAPR may include charges that are treated differently in an ordinary APR calculation.
Q: What if I am no longer on active duty?
A: Your status today is not the only fact worth examining. When reviewing how a loan was made, an important question is whether you were a covered borrower when you became obligated on the transaction.
Q: Does the MLA cover military spouses?
A: Qualifying dependents of covered servicemembers can be covered borrowers under the MLA. Whether a particular spouse or dependent qualifies depends on the statutory and regulatory definitions.
Q: What if my payday loan was from CashNetUSA?
A: If you obtained a CashNetUSA loan while you or your spouse was serving on active duty, the lender, product, loan date, military status, MAPR, fees, and contract terms may all be relevant. The fact that a servicemember obtained a CashNetUSA loan does not, by itself, establish that the MLA was violated.
(352) 753-8600
400 N Ashley Dr Ste 1900, Tampa, FL 33602, United States
9:00 AM- 6:00 PM
Closed
Closed
If you or your spouse had a payday loan, including a CashNetUSA loan, while one of you was serving on active duty, you do not need to decide on your own whether the Military Lending Act applies.
Contact Varnell & Warwick to discuss your situation and whether federal military lending protections may be relevant. Call (352) 753-8600 or email case@vandwlaw.com to schedule a no-cost consultation with one of our attorneys.
This article is for general informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. Whether the Military Lending Act, Servicemembers Civil Relief Act, or another law applies depends on the specific facts and circumstances of each situation. Reading this article does not create an attorney-client relationship with Varnell & Warwick.
