If you took out a CashNetUSA loan while you or your spouse was serving on active duty, your military status at the time the credit was opened may matter.
The Military Lending Act, or MLA, gives certain active-duty servicemembers and qualifying dependents added protections when they obtain covered consumer credit. Those protections can apply to many types of credit, including payday loans. But military status alone does not prove that a loan violated the law. The type of credit, the date it was opened, the borrower’s status, fees, MAPR, and contract terms can all affect the analysis.
The same questions may also matter if your payday loan came from a lender other than CashNetUSA. The starting point is often simple: Were you, your spouse, or another qualifying family member covered by the MLA when the credit was obtained? If you have other related questions, Varnell & Warwick is here to help you find answers.

Don’t let predatory lending drain your finances. Contact Varnell & Warwick today to discuss your situation and find out if you qualify for the CashNetUSA class action lawsuit.
For MLA purposes, timing is critical. The Department of Defense regulations generally define a covered borrower based on the consumer’s status when the person becomes obligated on a consumer credit transaction or establishes an account for consumer credit. Covered members include certain service members on active duty and members serving on qualifying Active Guard and Reserve duty. Qualifying dependents may also be covered.
That means these two situations can raise very different questions:
Example 1: You opened a payday loan or other covered credit account before entering active duty.
Example 2: You opened the credit while already serving on qualifying active duty.
The MLA analysis may differ because the borrower’s status at the time the credit was extended matters. For former servicemembers, the important question is therefore not always, “Are you active duty now?” If you were serving on qualifying active duty when you obtained the credit, the terms that applied when the credit was extended may still be worth reviewing.
Open-end credit, such as a line of credit, can raise additional timing questions because the account-opening date, later draws, and changes in military status may all be relevant under the regulations.


The MLA can cover many payday loans made to covered military borrowers.
The CFPB identifies payday loans, deposit-advance products, vehicle title loans, certain installment loans, and other forms of consumer credit among products that can fall within the MLA. Some types of credit are excluded, including certain residential mortgages and purchase-money loans secured by the vehicle or personal property being purchased.
That does not mean every payday loan made to someone in the military violates federal law.
The analysis may depend on:
The lender also matters. If your loan was from CashNetUSA, identifying the precise CashNetUSA product and the state where you lived can help clarify what type of credit you received.
If scammers used CashNetUSA’s name to exploit your finances, our consumer protection team can help. Reach out to Varnell & Warwick today to explore your class action legal options.
It is important not to assume that every CashNetUSA account is the same.
CashNetUSA currently describes different products depending on the borrower’s state, including lines of credit and installment loans. Its own website notes that product availability and terms vary by location.
If you remember your CashNetUSA account as a payday loan, check your paperwork before drawing conclusions about the legal classification.
Useful details include:
Those details can affect how the MLA applies.

Don’t let scammers who weaponized CashNetUSA’s name keep your money. Contact Varnell & Warwick today to see if a class action lawsuit can help you recover your stolen funds.
One of the most important distinctions for military borrowers is the difference between APR and MAPR.
The MLA generally prevents a creditor from imposing a Military Annual Percentage Rate greater than 36% on covered consumer credit. The MAPR calculation can include finance charges as well as certain application fees, participation fees, credit insurance costs, debt-cancellation charges, and fees for certain credit-related products.
That is different from simply saying: “The MLA caps APR at 36%.”
That statement can be misleading because APR and MAPR are separate calculations.
A loan showing an APR above 36% may give a military borrower a reason to look more closely at the transaction. It does not, standing alone, establish an MLA violation.
The relevant question is what MAPR applied to the covered credit after the required charges were included.


The MLA addresses more than the cost of credit.
For covered consumer credit, federal law and Department of Defense regulations place restrictions on several types of loan terms. Among other things, the regulations address mandatory arbitration, waivers of certain legal rights, mandatory military allotments, and penalties for paying covered credit early.
What about automatic bank withdrawals?
Automatic withdrawals deserve a closer look, but they should not automatically be treated as unlawful.
The MLA does not create a blanket ban on electronic fund transfers used to repay consumer credit. Department of Defense regulations allow certain electronic repayment arrangements when other requirements are satisfied.
If payments were automatically withdrawn from your bank account, save the bank statements and loan documents. They may help show how the account operated and what repayment terms you agreed to.
You do not need to calculate MAPR or determine whether federal law was violated before speaking with a lawyer.
If you still have them, consider keeping:
These records may help an attorney understand what credit you received, when you received it, and which federal protections may have applied.


The Military Lending Act and Service Members Civil Relief Act provide different protections.
The MLA generally focuses on covered consumer credit extended while a borrower has qualifying military status. Among its protections is the 36% MAPR limit.
The SCRA addresses different situations. For example, its interest-rate protection can limit interest to 6% on qualifying debts incurred before military service when its requirements are met.
So the timing question matters:
Credit obtained while on qualifying active duty: the MLA may be particularly relevant.
Debt incurred before entering military service: the SCRA may raise separate issues.
A loan should not be analyzed under one law simply because the borrower is or was in the military.
Ready to fight back? Tell Varnell & Warwick how CashNetUSA imposters targeted you, and let’s find out if a class action lawsuit can help recover your financial losses.

Q: Does the MLA apply to CashNetUSA loans?
A: It may. The answer depends on whether the borrower was a covered servicemember or qualifying dependent when the credit was opened, whether the CashNetUSA product was covered consumer credit, and the terms and costs of the transaction. Military status alone does not establish coverage or a violation.
Q: Is every CashNetUSA loan a payday loan?
A: No. CashNetUSA currently lists different products in different states, including lines of credit and installment loans. The actual agreement should be reviewed to determine what type of credit the borrower received.
Q: What if my CashNetUSA APR was over 36%?
A: An APR above 36% does not automatically establish an MLA violation. The MLA generally limits MAPR to 36% for covered consumer credit, and MAPR can include charges that differ from those used in the ordinary APR calculation.
Q: What if I am no longer on active duty?
A: Your current status does not by itself answer whether the MLA was relevant when the credit was extended. If you opened the loan or account while on qualifying active duty, the date, military status, and loan terms may still be important to reviewing what happened at that time.
Q: Can the MLA protect a military spouse?
A: Qualifying dependents, including spouses of covered servicemembers, may receive MLA protections. Whether a particular spouse was covered depends on the applicable requirements and status when the credit was obtained.
(352) 753-8600
400 N Ashley Dr Ste 1900, Tampa, FL 33602, United States
9:00 AM- 6:00 PM
Closed
Closed
If you or your spouse had a CashNetUSA loan while one of you was serving on active duty, you do not need to decide on your own whether the Military Lending Act applies.
The same is true if you received a payday loan from another lender during active-duty service. The lender, loan date, state, product, fees, military status, and loan documents may all matter. We handle nearly all of our cases on a contingency-fee basis, which generally means attorney fees are paid only if we win.
Contact Varnell & Warwick to discuss your situation and whether federal military lending protections may be relevant. Call (352) 753-8600 or email case@vandwlaw.com to schedule a no-cost consultation with one of our attorneys.
This article is for general informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. Whether the Military Lending Act, Servicemembers Civil Relief Act, or another law applies depends on the specific facts and circumstances of each situation. Reading this article does not create an attorney-client relationship with Varnell & Warwick.
